Hot Take/ Musical Confession Thread!

i dont care about the loudness war

i like loud music because it gives a ton of intensity to music.. hearing a loud guitar feels like there is more sound coming through, much more texture to it. listening to some albums at a quieter volume just sounds horrible. and dynamics aren't a big deal for me as long as the sound of the music is great
I think it depends on the type of album. I don't want an intimate folk album to clipped and compressed (although it worked for ITAOTS I guess), but for genres like punk and metal and groups like Death Grips, rawness and distortion add to it. It's all about knowing how to mix it appropriately, really
 
I suppose the difference between the two is that with brickwalled music everything is LOUD and there is no subtlety there. If you like loud music you can achieve that on a properly mastered record by cranking your volume up louder and you still have dynamics.
the thing is i dont wanna crank my computers audio louder because that makes youtube louder and then i have to set it back all over again.... why doesn't spotify's "loud, normal, quiet" settings for normalization actually make things louder or quieter


the real issue here is spotify doesn't actually raise any decibles of sound when you set it to loud on normalization... and music is quieter than youtube videos
 
the thing is i dont wanna crank my computers audio louder because that makes youtube louder and then i have to set it back all over again.... why doesn't spotify's "loud, normal, quiet" settings for normalization actually make things louder or quieter

Haha! I really don’t mind moving my amplifiers volume depending on the pressing I’m playing or if I switch from vinyl to CDs or streaming.
 
Haha! I really don’t mind moving my amplifiers volume depending on the pressing I’m playing or if I switch from vinyl to CDs or streaming.
i dont have an amp on my computer

i just have to use windows volume controls which not only give me that annoying sound everytime i click on the slider, but then i have to mess with it again after like 5 minutes
 
Yeah I don’t use a computer for music. In fact I barely use my computer for anything these days. Music on the stereo and internet on the phone/iPad!
rn im busy with a laptop for my games and my FLACs and my streaming because its easier than moving around more and more and having everything in one place is a lot easier for me
 
I could do it in small controlled doses but all day from morning to super late at night, not anymore.
I couldn’t do the big corporate ones anymore but if I have my way I’ll be at Glastonbury as an old man lol!
This is why we always do weekend 2 of Coachella... Weekend 1 is for the people who just want to GO and be seen there. They "do it for the 'Gram" basically. Weekend 2 is much more laid back, better organized, and crowds are there to see the artists.




My wife will probably drop out at some point but I don't see myself quitting Coachella anytime soon
What it all boils down to for me is probably the same reason why I felt sketched out the entire time I was wandering around NYC today. Just tooooooo damn many people. At any time today there were probably more people within one to two square blocks of me than live in my entire county. It’s just uncomfortable for me at this point. I need breathing room from other bodies. If I can smell your BO, cigarette, cologne, food, whatever, you’re too goddamn close.
 
What it all boils down to for me is probably the same reason why I felt sketched out the entire time I was wandering around NYC today. Just tooooooo damn many people. At any time today there were probably more people within one to two square blocks of me than live in my entire county. It’s just uncomfortable for me at this point. I need breathing room from other bodies. If I can smell your BO, cigarette, cologne, food, whatever, you’re too goddamn close.

I actually live for big crowds of people, as long as we're all outdoors and not smashed into a small club that's at capacity. I think I feed off their energy.
 
Really? I thought it was a hot take when I had it back in the 90s, but as the decades have passed, I feel like it becomes more of an observation. I hear he is still a good live act, but usually legends of the past that maybe hit a dry spell for a decade or so have that big late career creative resurgence. Think Cash, Dylan...hell even Brian Wilson. Stevie seems pretty content to make appearances at awards shows and collect lifetime achievement awards, which, by the way, I believe he started receiving in the 80s. No joke.
I really hope this doesn't come across as pretentious, but: I feel like any interest in his work from the 80s onwards is much more likely to be coming from casual fans, or those who are only really familiar with his most mainstream output. Whereas in a place for music nerds like us, the 1972-1976 stretch is more likely to be the overall consensus for the best "phase" of his career. Critically, most of his post-1980 work has been reviled - he found much more love in the mainstream pop sphere than in the serious music nerd circles who loved the Music Of My Mind -> Songs In The Key Of Life stretch :P
 
I really hope this doesn't come across as pretentious, but: I feel like any interest in his work from the 80s onwards is much more likely to be coming from casual fans, or those who are only really familiar with his most mainstream output. Whereas in a place for music nerds like us, the 1972-1976 stretch is more likely to be the overall consensus for the best "phase" of his career. Critically, most of his post-1980 work has been reviled - he found much more love in the mainstream pop sphere than in the serious music nerd circles who loved the Music Of My Mind -> Songs In The Key Of Life stretch :p

Real talk...he simply hasn't released all that much stuff from the 80's on. His last release of new material, according to All Music Guide, was 2005. Two of his releases over that time were soundtracks, and one was a live record that featured some newer songs. He's done some one off collaborations, but there are maybe two songs I could name off of his work post-"Woman In Red" soundtrack from 1984. That's 35 years ago. Maybe the guy just sapped all his creative genius reserves early on. I dunno, but of all the sacred cows from the 60's and 70's, I feel like Stevie has kind of gotten by on his golden period more than pretty much anyone.
 
I’d argue 2.30-3.30 is ideal song length time. Over 4.30 and you are in trouble, over 5.30 and no way Jose! There are exceptions but they tend to prove the rule. Bohemian Rhapsody isn’t one of them, it’s terrible in every way possible.
Going through this thread only now, but I'd like to say all may Kraftwerk records are giving you cheesy smiles, the SWANS records are holding sledgehammers and look pretty manic, and your copy of OK Computer is giving you puppy dog eyes.

Naturally, A Night at the Opera smirked, turned up it's nose and sauntered away.
 
Going through this thread only now, but I'd like to say all may Kraftwerk records are giving you cheesy smiles, the SWANS records are holding sledgehammers and look pretty manic, and your copy of OK Computer is giving you puppy dog eyes.

Naturally, A Night at the Opera smirked, turned up it's nose and sauntered away.

Yeah, Kraftwerk were mixtape/mix CD killers back in the day. I was over the moon when I found a best of comp that had single edits on it. Songs were still longer than your average tune, but they were downright bite-size by Kraftwerk standards.
 
Yeah, Kraftwerk were mixtape/mix CD killers back in the day. I was over the moon when I found a best of comp that had single edits on it. Songs were still longer than your average tune, but they were downright bite-size by Kraftwerk standards.
Sounds like it would. I mean, I think a lot of their stuff only works because it's been allowed to groove, difficult to picture what a pared-down version of “Europe Endless” would sound like. I've come to the conclusion “Autobahn” is paced out like a normal pop song, it's just seven times longer than one and I think that's hysterical. As a counterpoint though, I'm honestly surprised at how well the 2.5 minute radio edit manages to get across all the individual portions of the song.
 
Sounds like it would. I mean, I think a lot of their stuff only works because it's been allowed to groove, difficult to picture what a pared-down version of “Europe Endless” would sound like. I've come to the conclusion “Autobahn” is paced out like a normal pop song, it's just seven times longer than one and I think that's hysterical. As a counterpoint though, I'm honestly surprised at how well the 2.5 minute radio edit manages to get across all the individual portions of the song.

These edits were actually well done and effective. I think the album version of 'Neon Lights' is one of the most beautiful synth based pop songs ever. That said, having a version to put on mixes that was only 3:30 was awesome. Still got the general feel of the song, but still allowed me room for other tracks.
 
Back
Top