Just like many of the bands I want to see, the closest one to me is in Houston.
Just like many of the bands I want to see, the closest one to me is in Houston.
Just like many of the bands I want to see, the closest one to me is in Houston.
Just like many of the bands I want to see, the closest one to me is in Houston.
My problem is I hate the venue I could see a match in so I might actually go to Houston instead.
I'm a little bitter that the Rose Bowl didn't get a bid. I get we all need shiny and new but that's hands down the best venue in the United States for watching an outdoor event. Every seat has a great sight line and it hosted the damn Final in 1994.I was looking at the bid cities and New Orleans was rejected in the first round with San Antonio, Indy, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and some others.
Then Chicago, Minneapolis, and DC (FedEx) withdrawing leaves me with a feeling of meh for some of the choices.
Jerry World in the sprawl between Dallas and Ft. Worth being one. The Levis Stadium location is bland too. No doubt they'll show majestic aerial views of the SF skyline while the stadium sits over an hour away in Santa Clara.
I'm a little bitter that the Rose Bowl didn't get a bid. I get we all need shiny and new but that's hands down the best venue in the United States for watching an outdoor event. Every seat has a great sight line and it hosted the damn Final in 1994.
Anyone know if Can/Mex/U.S all get automatic qualification as co-hosts ?
Perhaps FIFA or the organizing committee had some trepidation about gambling.I guess some are scratching their heads as to why Las Vegas didn’t make the cut, but besides money, what are FIFA’s requirements? Infrastructure? Public transportation? Ease of access?
I guess some are scratching their heads as to why Las Vegas didn’t make the cut, but besides money, what are FIFA’s requirements? Infrastructure? Public transportation? Ease of access?
They do indeed. The field also expands to 48 teams. Going to be a lot games!
I’d have taken one away from Texas and/or one away from the east coast to give it to Chicago and move Kansas City to Denver. But I wonder if Fifa were concerned about altitude maybe?
I hadn't thought about that. No Chicago is definitely surprising too. Denver would have been pretty isolated and I did see rumors that Edmonton also wanted to be a part of it. Also pretty isolated. It's probably a logistics thing like you said.They’re playing matches at the Azteca which is a fair bit higher so the altitude in Denver is absolutely not a consideration. More likely the bid team form the US didn’t nominate Denver because they wouldn’t make as much money from it and probably the logistics of where it is compared to other host cities.
I hadn't thought about that. No Chicago is definitely surprising too. Denver would have been pretty isolated and I did see rumors that Edmonton also wanted to be a part of it. Also pretty isolated. It's probably a logistics thing like you said.
Idk about that, Kansas City is even smaller population-wise, it makes even less sense. If anything you'd pick St. Louis in the same state which is a bigger metro and historically more important. Denver definitely has the capacity and facilities to host matches, they must have just not wanted to for whatever reason ($$$)Yeah I don’t think altitude comes into it unless someone wanted to play a game in somewhere like Cuzco or La Paz. FIFA have shown themselves to be pretty ambivalent to fans and player conditions so long as the money is rolling in. In 2014 they sent England and Italy to play games in the absurd choice of Manus which was essentially in the Amazon and humid as hell. And then Qatar. And then Russia where the cities were insanely grouped and fans and teams were flying back and forth across what is essentially a continent. More likely they didn’t see Denver having the local support plus the capacity to host that scale of event and so they didn’t think the money was there. It is a pretty small city, especially on an American scale.
Idk about that, Kansas City is even smaller population-wise, it makes even less sense. If anything you'd pick St. Louis in the same state which is a bigger metro and historically more important. Denver definitely has the capacity and facilities to host matches, they must have just not wanted to for whatever reason ($$$)