Political Discussion

RenegadeMonster said:
www.aol.com

Couple can't sue Uber after daughter clicked away trial rights on Uber Eats

A couple, badly hurt in an Uber crash, can’t sue the company because their daughter once waived trial rights while using Uber Eats — a fateful click that prevents the family from suing the tech giant, a New Jersey appellate court ruled.
www.aol.com www.aol.com

We need to make arbitration clauses as part of terms of service or a requirement of lacing in a order (such as with Uber Eats) illegal.

They are very anti consumer and most consumes probably don't even know they are entering into that kind of contact.
Click to expand...
This is very similar to the couple who went to Disneyland. They went to a restaurant, the wife had a severe food allergy, they told the waiter not to put that certain thing in the food but the kitchen still put it in. She ate it, had a reaction and died. But because the couple agreed to terms for Disney+ 5 years prior, the husband couldn’t sue.
 
The Denmarkian Wonder said:
This is very similar to the couple who went to Disneyland. They went to a restaurant, the wife had a severe food allergy, they told the waiter not to put that certain thing in the food but the kitchen still put it in. She ate it, had a reaction and died. But because the couple agreed to terms for Disney+ 5 years prior, the husband couldn’t sue.
Click to expand...
Disney eventually decided to let that one go to trial because the press was too bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top