MikeH
Well-Known Member
don't mean for it to be patronizing, but the "i love parity" line is always used when it comes to KD and it simply doesn't make sense to me. there's hardly parity in the NBA when it comes to who wins every year. There have been a few surprises along the way of course (Raps, Pistons, Mavs), but the chances that the warriors weren't going to the Finals without KD were still insanely high. They drafted smartly, planned for the cap spike and developed talent well. They lucked out with some team friendly deals along the way too. But they made the most of it. I can't hate on a team that did things "the right way" and were successful.Not gonna lie. Parts of this felt pretty patronizing. As if I don't know NBA history and the traditional lack of parity.
Even during the Jordan era things didn't feel inevitable most years. (Granted I also saw the 93-97). You had the Shaq / Penny Magic. Barkley and the Suns give them good run. Even that last Jazz series was competitive. And there were no super teams. Same for the Kobe / Gasol and later Spurs years. See the Spurs winning in 14', Dirk leading his team in 11', ext.
Furthermore, the lack of parity really boils down to a couple of glamor franchises who get first pick of everything. Whether that means star FA, role players on discounts, buyouts or guys like Austin Reeves refusing to be drafted so they can go to the Lakers. Even Kobe was a variant of that. And the league has done a solid job of combating that too. RFA. The repeater tax. Ext.
But it boils down to this, we watch the sport for different reasons. And I come from the view of a die hard fan of a long suffering small-market team. I don't like watching dynasties in general. But I especially have 0 interest in watching a team blast everyone on their way through the playoffs. At that point, I'm not even gonna bother watching the fucking playoffs. And I think it's rad af when players like Dame or Reggie or Dirk or Duncan (though Dirk and Duncan were always contending) form a bond with a small market and want to be lifers. It's moronic that you frame that from an ownership standpoint. How about the fans? The kids that get to watch the entire career of a player. The fans that don't have to have their heart broken when a star player on a really good team (Melo, Lebron, KD) forces his way out to a bigger market.
And I'm certainly not gonna respect a player who wants to be considered top 10 all-time when he joins a 70 win, already won a title team. That's cupcake shit.
The NBA CBA is structured in a way that it's easy to maintain players, go over the cap to re-sign , etc. and when a team like the Warriors doesn't care about luxury or repeater tax, the likelihood that they have a prolonged Finals run is very very high outside of injuries.
And I kinda disagree about the glamor franchise thing. Lakers post-Phil were a mess. They didn't get big FAs to sign there unless they were past their prime (that Dwight/Nash Slam magazine cover is hilarious to look at now). Even when Bron signed there because he wanted a hollywood career, the only reason they got people to sign with them was because of Klutch forcing an AD trade. They didn't really get anybody great to sign there on a huge discount unless they were past their prime guys like Melo. As for the Austin Reaves thing, this happens with tons of teams. Fox refused to work out with a bunch of teams to go play for the Sacramento Kings. THE KINGS lol. Haliburton also tried to push his way to the Kings. Steph Curry wanted to go to the Knicks so refused a workout with the Warriors. They drafted him anyway. Players and their agents often try to get guys who are mocked late 1st round into the 2nd round to get a better contract and more player-friendly deal to become a UFA sooner. And if you're not mocked until the late 2nd, it's smarter to go undrafted if you know a team wants you.
I agree it's very cool when somebody stays loyal to a team for their whole career. And some of my favorite champs over the past 20-30 years have been underdog teams like the Pistons. But I also understand why KD wanted to leave OKC, why Bron wanted to leave Cleveland, why Dwight and Shaq wanted out of Orlando, etc. don't forget Timmy and Kobe also demanded trades at points in their careers. When people spend a ton of time analyzing careers and say "that guy can't be an all-time great because he didn't win a ring", then I don't feel bad at all when players want out.
But it boils down to this, we watch the sport for different reasons.
I'm a Knicks fan so I think we do watch the sport for the same reasons haha. Not sure who your team is.