Mmmmmmm but
@tvham wasn’t shaming anyone for owning any Michael Jackson records! He just said he beforehand looked as if he was defending John Mayer which isn’t right! Even my comment about Michael Jackson’s discography being better than John Mayer’s was a bit insensitive too!
I think it’s just that a lot of people find Paedophilia very unforgiving, moreso than domestic violence/violence/sexual assault in general. I also agree that both crimes/acts are just as bad as each other, but I’m also very forgiving too, especially if people are genuinely remorseful and can prove they will change/have changed.
Yes, John Mayer committed those acts, but should he be forgiven? Maybe if he was truly remorseful, yes? Still, what he did was wrong and we aren’t ignoring it, but we are celebrating the album - the artist, like
@tvham implies, not the domestic violence abuser.
R. Kelly on the other hand does not seem remorseful at all for his disgusting behaviour. So, I think VMP would, and should never touch his work!
I agree so much with your last paragraph though! VMP do seem hypocritical! Like, was the abuse allegations against NaS’ even proven? Like as you said, Storf said VMP will never touch NaS because of those allegations! Why the fuck are VMP doing John Mayer then? That’s super hypocritical!