Same. And I will be fully onboard with Shapiro if he is the choice. I just think Kamala is enough to win most states and why alienate anyone that you might need for places like Michigan? The problem is money will probably win out here and the big donors are more onboard with Shapiro. Walz is just that rare politician that actually makes you like politicians.
Fully expecting disappointment in this area. Will be funny watching them trip over themselves trying to defend Josh's handling of sexual harassment like they didn't know or whatever.
They employ enough lawyers to have multiple fronts. No sense employing a division to look at monopolistic practices if they don't make use of it. Google's not even the worst offender though and I have doubts it'll hold up on appeal, but a little competition in the search space would be nice since Google started to suck more. Don't give a crap about ad revenue monopolization tho.
I know but this is not the shit anybody is worried about other than the former Trump administration since it was filed by them. Never talked to a single human being that said man you know what I’d really wish the government would go after Google. So many more monopolies out there that actually affect human lives and livelihoods.
I only care about it insofar as I'm all about breaking up these behemoth monopolies that control so much of our data and influence us in ways most of us never realize. You aren't wrong that there are better targets, but the DOJ hasn't gone after monopolies or had much success at it in a long ass time. So if this puts a little fear in the corps and gets the DOJ fired up to go after some of the others then I support it.
Why do we care about illegitimate lines of attack? They're going to go low and make even just make shit up no matter who it is. Why plan your strategy based on what they might say about you instead of the actual quality of the candidate?
