AnthonyI
Well-Known Member
I understand your point of view, but as @TenderLovingKiller® posted, the options are what they are. The difference is that the "lesser of two evils" has a completely different outcome than how it's been perceived in the past.What's laughable is that Kamala is a lesser evil. The U.S. already is directly involved; her boss, from whom she refuses to break, even in October, is the single most responsible people for this genocide. A genocidaire is not a lesser evil. (She and Biden also brag about the amount of fossil fuels the U.S. is producing and Kamala is again in support of fracking, so not sure how climate change is relevant here either.)
As @ayayrawn has already pointed out: the Dems continuing to count on your vote year after year, with no policy other than "we're not our opponent!", is why they continually drift rightward and have ended up here.
Whether most Americans care is beside the point. Voters, say, 18–35, are a huge demographic on which the Dems have relied for support. With the Dems have continually spitting in their face, fewer of those voters will show up. That's not debatable.
I hate having to pick the lesser of two evils, always have, but we're never going to make a meaningful shift over one election, it takes time. But, at this moment in time we're dealing with a completely different scenario and candidate. One that, if you have half a brain, should realize he could bring on the end of democracy as we know it. Then what? How do you start to make the changes at that point?
So I understand your concerns, but in my opinion, this isn't the time, this country needs to get back to some sort of normal before we can start to make actual changes. To each his own, vote, don't vote, but understand that any and all choices are contributing to the outcome. Now weigh the benefits or lack there of, of those outcomes.
Last edited: